- 10almonds
- Posts
- Gluten: What's The Truth?
Today’s almonds have been activated by:
Loading Screen Tip: being loved deeply gives you strength, while loving deeply gives you courage
⏰ IN A RUSH?
Today’s 30-Second Summary
If you don’t have time to read the whole email today, here are some key takeaways:
Gluten is a category of protein found in wheat, barley, rye, and triticale
Celiac disease is an autoimmune disease that affects about 1% of people.
People with celiac disease will respond adversely to gluten, with effects including inflammation of the small intestine, and the destruction of the interior walls of same.
Wheat allergy is not the same thing as that, or the same thing as gluten sensitivity, but is also a thing that affects many people.
An allergic reaction to wheat can have moderate to severe effects, including difficulty breathing upon ingesting or inhaling wheat flour.
Non-celiac gluten sensitivity remains quite mysterious in science, and may be a collection of related or unrelated physiological reactions, either directly and/or due to nocebo effect.
Wheat, specifically, may cause some problems unrelated to gluten or allergies, and they're beyond the scope of today's main feature, but are worth acknowledging too.
Wouldn’t it be great to have a personal chef who prepares delicious meals packed full of nutritious superfoods?
Today’s sponsor, Thistle, deliver exactly that (fully-prepared ready-to-eat healthy tasty meals, not ingredient packs) to your home on your schedule.
Read on to learn about these things and more…
👀 WATCH AND LEARN
Vegan & Gluten Free Pancakes (Gum & Nut Free)
Prefer text? A text version of the recipe can be found in the video’s description!
🌾 MAIN FEATURE
Gluten: What’s The Truth?
We asked you for your health-related view of gluten, and got the above spread of results. To put it simply:
Around 60% of voters voted for “Gluten is bad if you have an allergy/sensitivity; otherwise fine”
The rest of the votes were split fairly evenly between the other three options:
Gluten is bad for everyone and we should avoid it
Gluten is bad if (and only if) you have Celiac disease
Gluten is fine for all, and going gluten-free is a modern fad
First, let’s define some terms so that we’re all on the same page:
What is gluten?
Gluten is a category of protein found in wheat, barley, rye, and triticale. As such, it’s not one single compound, but a little umbrella of similar compounds. However, for the sake of not making this article many times longer, we’re going to refer to “gluten” without further specification.
What is Celiac disease?
Celiac disease is an autoimmune disease. Like many autoimmune diseases, we don’t know for sure how/why it occurs, but a combination of genetic and environmental factors have been strongly implicated, with the latter putatively including overexposure to gluten.
It affects about 1% of the world’s population, and people with Celiac disease will tend to respond adversely to gluten, notably by inflammation of the small intestine and destruction of enterocytes (the cells that line the wall of the small intestine). This in turn causes all sorts of other problems, beyond the scope of today’s main feature, but suffice it to say, it’s not pleasant.
What is an allergy/intolerance/sensitivity?
This may seem basic, but a lot of people conflate allergy/intolerance/sensitivity, so:
An allergy is when the body mistakes a harmless substance for something harmful, and responds inappropriately. This can be mild (e.g. allergic rhinitis, hayfever) or severe (e.g. peanut allergy), and as such, responses can vary from “sniffly nose” to “anaphylactic shock and death”.
In the case of a wheat allergy (for example), this is usually somewhere between the two, and can for example cause breathing problems after ingesting wheat or inhaling wheat flour.
An intolerance is when the body fails to correctly process something it should be able to process, and just ejects it half-processed instead.
A common and easily demonstrable example is lactose intolerance. There isn’t a well-defined analog for gluten, but gluten intolerance is nonetheless a well-reported thing.
A sensitivity is when none of the above apply, but the body nevertheless experiences unpleasant symptoms after exposure to a substance that should normally be safe.
In the case of gluten, this is referred to as non-Celiac gluten sensitivity
A word on scientific objectivity: at 10almonds we try to report science as objectively as possible. Sometimes people have strong feelings on a topic, especially if it is polarizing.
Sometimes people with a certain condition feel constantly disbelieved and mocked; sometimes people without a certain condition think others are imagining problems for themselves where there are none.
We can’t diagnose anyone or validate either side of that, but what we can do is report the facts as objectively as science can lay them out.
Gluten is fine for all, and going gluten-free is a modern fad: True or False?
Definitely False, Celiac disease is a real autoimmune disease that cannot be faked, and allergies are also a real thing that people can have, and again can be validated in studies. Even intolerances have scientifically measurable symptoms and can be tested against nocebo.
See for example:
However! It may not be a modern fad, so much as a modern genuine increase in incidence.
Widespread varieties of wheat today contain a lot more gluten than wheat of ages past, and many other molecular changes mean there are other compounds in modern grains that never even existed before.
However, the health-related impact of these (novel proteins and carbohydrates) is currently still speculative, and we are not in the business of speculating, so we’ll leave that as a “this hasn’t been studied enough to comment yet but we recognize it could potentially be a thing” factor.
Gluten is bad if (and only if) you have Celiac disease: True or False?
Definitely False; allergies for example are well-evidenced as real; same facts as we discussed/linked just above.
Gluten is bad for everyone and we should avoid it: True or False?
False, tentatively and contingently.
First, as established, there are people with clinically-evidenced Celiac disease, wheat allergy, or similar. Obviously, they should avoid triggering those diseases.
What about the rest of us, and what about those who have non-Celiac gluten sensitivity?
Clinical testing has found that of those reporting non-Celiac gluten sensitivity, nocebo-controlled studies validate that diagnosis in only a minority of cases.
In the following study, for example, only 16% of those reporting symptoms showed them in the trials, and 40% of those also showed a nocebo response (i.e., like placebo, but a bad rather than good effect):
This one, on the other hand, found that positive validations of diagnoses were found to be between 7% and 77%, depending on the trial, with an average of 30%:
In other words: non-Celiac gluten sensitivity is a thing, and/but may be over-reported, and/but may be in some part exacerbated by psychosomatic effect.
Note: psychosomatic effect does not mean “imagining it” or “all in your head”. Indeed, the “soma” part of the word “psychosomatic” has to do with its measurable effect on the rest of the body.
For example, while pain can’t be easily objectively measured, other things, like inflammation, definitely can.
As for everyone else? If you’re enjoying your wheat (or similar) products, it’s well-established that they should be wholegrain for the best health impact (fiber, a positive for your health, rather than white flour’s super-fast metabolites padding the liver and causing metabolic problems).
Wheat itself may have other problems, for example FODMAPs, amylase trypsin inhibitors, and wheat germ agglutinins, but that’s “a wheat thing” rather than “a gluten thing”.
That’s beyond the scope of today’s main feature, but you might want to check out today’s featured book!
For a final scientific opinion on this last one, though, here’s what a respected academic journal of gastroenterology has to say:
❤️ OUR SPONSORS MAKE THIS PUBLICATION POSSIBLE
Autopilot your diet | Save Time. Eat well. Feel amazing.
Thistle take the hassle out of healthy eating!
How?
By delivering delicious, nutritious, majority plant-based meals packed full of superfoods. They cover breakfast, lunch, and dinner, with plant and meat protein options to suit your needs/preferences.
Their menu is highly customizable, but is gluten-free by default, and has vegan options too for those who want that.
These aren’t ingredient packs—these are ready-to-eat, fully prepared meals, delivered on your schedule to your home (or work, or wherever). Everything is organic and locally-sourced when possible.
And yes, you can pause anytime; there’s no commitment.
Please do visit our sponsors—they help keep 10almonds free
🌍 AROUND THE WEB
What’s happening in the health world…
Intermittent fasting improves Alzheimer's pathology, study shows
Ballet flats are back. Here’s what the research says about how they affect your feet
Endometriosis: How do you keep exercising with the condition?
Melatonin enhances long-term memory by modulating protein phosphorylation
Omicron infection may increase risk of reinfection, study finds
Are irregular sleep patterns associated with increased mortality risk?
What is the effect of a workplace adherence to the Mediterranean diet for 12 months?
More to come tomorrow!
📖 ONE-MINUTE BOOK REVIEW
Wheat Belly, Revised & Expanded Edition: Lose the Wheat, Lose the Weight, and Find Your Path Back to Health – by Dr. William Davis
This review pertains to the 2019 edition of the book, not the 2011 original, which will not have had all of the same research.
We are told, by scientific consensus, to enjoy plenty of whole grains as part of our diet. So, what does cardiologist Dr. William Davis have against wheat?
Firstly, not all grains are interchangeable, and wheat—in particular, modern strains of wheat—cannot be described as the same as the wheat of times past.
While this book does touch on the gluten aspect (and Celiac disease), and notes that modern wheat has a much higher gluten content than older strains, most of this book is about other harms that wheat can do to us.
Dr. Davis explores and explains the metabolic implications of wheat's unique properties on organs such as our pancreas, liver, heart, and brain.
The book does also have recipes and meal plans, though in this reviewer's opinion they were a little superfluous. Wheat is not hard to cut out unless you are living in a food desert or are experiencing food poverty, in which case, those recipes and meal plans would also not help.
Bottom line: this book, filled with plenty of actual science, makes a strong case against wheat, and again, mostly for reasons other than its gluten content. You might want to cut yours down!
What did you think of today's newsletter?We always love to hear from you, whether you leave us a comment or even just a click in the poll if you're speeding by! |
May today see you well-prepared for the coming weekend,
The 10almonds Team