- 10almonds
- Posts
- Why Creatine May Be No Help For Muscle Size
Why Creatine May Be No Help For Muscle Size
Plus: how your diet may be sabotaging your flexibility (& how to fix it)
Happy Friday đ
âYour body hears everything your mind saysâ
~ Dr. Ginni Mansberg
In todayâs email we cover the weekâs health news including creatine and genomic screening, how diet impacts flexibility, and improving eyesight without glasses.
Here at 10almonds, weâve written before about how language-learning (at any level) is protective against cognitive decline, so take advantage of Babbelâs Spring Sale, and claim 60% off using this link! â You can also see the selection of languages available here
Todayâs Main Feature
Why Creatine May Be No Help For Muscle SizePlus: how useful is genomic testing for the participant, really? |
Recommended Reading
People On Ozempic May Have Fewer Heart Attacks, Strokes, And AddictionsâŚbut more nausea, vomiting and stomach pain: |
Why Everyone You Donât Like Is A NarcissistâŚand what to do about it: |
Watch and Learn
How Your Diet May Be Causing Chronic Tightness (& How To Fix It)
There is more to hamstring flexibility than just stretching:
Prefer text? The above video will take you to a 10almonds page with a text-overview, as well as the video!
Our Sponsors Make This Publication Possible
Make Your Next Vacation Unforgettable!
Are you ready to ditch the touristy spots and explore like a local? With Babbel, youâll be bargaining at markets, making friends, and finding the best local spotsâall without awkward hand gestures or Google Translate. And with lessons designed by real language experts, youâll be ready to speak in just three weeks at 10mins/day.
Not going anywhere soon? Then nowâs a great time to get a head start on language-learning; your brain will thank you for it!
On which note: here at 10almonds, weâve written before about how language-learning (at any level) is protective against cognitive decline, so take advantage of Babbelâs Spring Sale, and claim 60% off using the following link:
Please do visit our sponsorsâthey help keep 10almonds free
This Or That?
Vote on Which is Healthier
Yesterday we asked you to choose between celery and chardâwe picked the chard (click here to read about why), as did 73% of you!
Now for todayâs choice:
Click on whichever you think is better for you!
Bonus (Sponsored) Recommendation
Fun fact: if you saw todayâs sponsor and thought âthat seems like a good idea; I must do that one of these daysâ, then today is already one of these days, so why not make it the first day of your exciting new language-learning journey? Click here to see the languages available đ
One-Minute Book Review
The Bates Method for Better Eyesight Without Glasses â by Dr. William Bates
This is a very popular book and method, albeit not a very new one. It was first published in 1920; self-published by Dr. Bates, as the American Medical Association (AMA) considered it quackery.
Of course, our understanding of eyesight has improved a lot in the past 100 years, so, with the benefit of an extra century of ophthalmological research, who was on the right side of history?
As it turns out, all of Dr. Batesâ ideas have been firmly disproven, and eyes simply do not work the way he thought they do (for example, he believed that rather than adjusting the lens for focus, the muscles around the eye elongate the eyeball; this absolutely is not how focusing works, and while how much those muscles squeeze the eye does vary depending on some physiological factors, there are no known exercises that can change them).
Nevertheless, for the interested, his techniques include such things as:
putting pressure on oneâs eyes with oneâs hands (which can increase glaucoma risk)
visualization, rather than actual viewing, of an eye chart (this is ironic, because the book cover promises that an eye chart is included; it is not; perhaps it was hoped that we would visualize it more vividly and thus see it?)
sunning, which is not only directly looking at the sun, but also using a burning glass to increase the focus of the sunlight onto oneâs eye (please do not do this under any circumstances)
His primary thesis in this work, though, is that eyesight problems of all kinds (from short- and long-sightedness, to more serious things like cataracts and glaucoma) are caused by the tension produced by reading books, so relaxation exercises are his prescription for this.
The style is characteristic of its era and then some; bold claims are made with no evidence, there are no references, and the text is (ironically, given his opinions on tension being produced by reading books) quite dense. It certainly doesnât lend itself well to skimming, for example, because something critical can easily be buried in a wall of text of what is, honestly, mostly waffle.
Bottom line: if youâd like to improve your eyesight and reduce your dependency on glasses, then we absolutely cannot recommend this book, and would direct you instead to Vision for Life, Revised Edition â by Dr. Meir Schneider, which is much more consistent with actual science.
PS: Dr. Bates certainly was an interesting fellow; he disappeared mysteriously, but was found working as a medical assistant a few weeks later by his wife, whom he now claimed to not recognize. Then he disappeared again two days later (his wife never found him, this time, despite trying for many years), only to show up again, 13 years later, shortly after his wifeâs death, whereupon he remarried (to his long-time personal assistant). None of this has anything to do with his fascinating opinions on eyesight, but itâs a story worth mentioning.
Penny For Your Thoughts?
What did you think of today's newsletter?We always love to hear from you, whether you leave us a comment or even just a click in the poll if you're speeding by! |
May today see you well-prepared for the coming weekend,
The 10almonds Team