• 10almonds
  • Posts
  • Why Creatine May Be No Help For Muscle Size

Why Creatine May Be No Help For Muscle Size

Plus: how your diet may be sabotaging your flexibility (& how to fix it)

Happy Friday 👋 

❝Your body hears everything your mind says❞
~ Dr. Ginni Mansberg

In today’s email we cover the week’s health news including creatine and genomic screening, how diet impacts flexibility, and improving eyesight without glasses.

Here at 10almonds, we’ve written before about how language-learning (at any level) is protective against cognitive decline, so take advantage of Babbel’s Spring Sale, and claim 60% off using this link! ← You can also see the selection of languages available here

Today’s Main Feature

Why Creatine May Be No Help For Muscle Size

Plus: how useful is genomic testing for the participant, really?

Recommended Reading

People On Ozempic May Have Fewer Heart Attacks, Strokes, And Addictions

…but more nausea, vomiting and stomach pain:

Why Everyone You Don’t Like Is A Narcissist

…and what to do about it:

Watch and Learn

How Your Diet May Be Causing Chronic Tightness (& How To Fix It)

There is more to hamstring flexibility than just stretching:

Prefer text? The above video will take you to a 10almonds page with a text-overview, as well as the video!

Our Sponsors Make This Publication Possible

Make Your Next Vacation Unforgettable!

Are you ready to ditch the touristy spots and explore like a local? With Babbel, you’ll be bargaining at markets, making friends, and finding the best local spots—all without awkward hand gestures or Google Translate. And with lessons designed by real language experts, you’ll be ready to speak in just three weeks at 10mins/day.

Not going anywhere soon? Then now’s a great time to get a head start on language-learning; your brain will thank you for it!

On which note: here at 10almonds, we’ve written before about how language-learning (at any level) is protective against cognitive decline, so take advantage of Babbel’s Spring Sale, and claim 60% off using the following link:

Please do visit our sponsors—they help keep 10almonds free

This Or That?

Vote on Which is Healthier

Yesterday we asked you to choose between celery and chard—we picked the chard (click here to read about why), as did 73% of you!

Now for today’s choice:

Click on whichever you think is better for you!

Bonus (Sponsored) Recommendation

Fun fact: if you saw today’s sponsor and thought “that seems like a good idea; I must do that one of these days”, then today is already one of these days, so why not make it the first day of your exciting new language-learning journey? Click here to see the languages available 😎

One-Minute Book Review

The Bates Method for Better Eyesight Without Glasses − by Dr. William Bates

This is a very popular book and method, albeit not a very new one. It was first published in 1920; self-published by Dr. Bates, as the American Medical Association (AMA) considered it quackery.

Of course, our understanding of eyesight has improved a lot in the past 100 years, so, with the benefit of an extra century of ophthalmological research, who was on the right side of history?

As it turns out, all of Dr. Bates’ ideas have been firmly disproven, and eyes simply do not work the way he thought they do (for example, he believed that rather than adjusting the lens for focus, the muscles around the eye elongate the eyeball; this absolutely is not how focusing works, and while how much those muscles squeeze the eye does vary depending on some physiological factors, there are no known exercises that can change them).

Nevertheless, for the interested, his techniques include such things as:

  • putting pressure on one’s eyes with one’s hands (which can increase glaucoma risk)

  • visualization, rather than actual viewing, of an eye chart (this is ironic, because the book cover promises that an eye chart is included; it is not; perhaps it was hoped that we would visualize it more vividly and thus see it?)

  • sunning, which is not only directly looking at the sun, but also using a burning glass to increase the focus of the sunlight onto one’s eye (please do not do this under any circumstances)

His primary thesis in this work, though, is that eyesight problems of all kinds (from short- and long-sightedness, to more serious things like cataracts and glaucoma) are caused by the tension produced by reading books, so relaxation exercises are his prescription for this.

The style is characteristic of its era and then some; bold claims are made with no evidence, there are no references, and the text is (ironically, given his opinions on tension being produced by reading books) quite dense. It certainly doesn’t lend itself well to skimming, for example, because something critical can easily be buried in a wall of text of what is, honestly, mostly waffle.

Bottom line: if you’d like to improve your eyesight and reduce your dependency on glasses, then we absolutely cannot recommend this book, and would direct you instead to Vision for Life, Revised Edition – by Dr. Meir Schneider, which is much more consistent with actual science.

PS: Dr. Bates certainly was an interesting fellow; he disappeared mysteriously, but was found working as a medical assistant a few weeks later by his wife, whom he now claimed to not recognize. Then he disappeared again two days later (his wife never found him, this time, despite trying for many years), only to show up again, 13 years later, shortly after his wife’s death, whereupon he remarried (to his long-time personal assistant). None of this has anything to do with his fascinating opinions on eyesight, but it’s a story worth mentioning.

Penny For Your Thoughts?

What did you think of today's newsletter?

We always love to hear from you, whether you leave us a comment or even just a click in the poll if you're speeding by!

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.

May today see you well-prepared for the coming weekend,

The 10almonds Team